|
It’s amazing to think that the TX series is approaching 20 years now… Wow, I guess I’ve gotten older too.
Anyway, I tried comparing this new TXCOMP (hereafter New TXCOMP → NTX) with the much older TXPRO (Old TXPRO → OTX). As usual, I even tested them one foot at a time.
Wowーthe difference is far greater than I had imagined! It almost feels
like they come from completely different design philosophies… Hmm. The
biggest difference I noticed is the stiffness of the shell, especially
around the ankle in terms of feel.
For better or worse, the OTX responds to downward pressure by flexingーnot
just at the bellows, but with the entire shell compressing and bending.
As a result, when you release the load, you feel a rebound from the whole
boot.
With the NTX, however, it’s a different story. Under downward pressure,
the shell around the ankle doesn’t give at allーit stays rigid and solid.
The force is directed through the bellows and strongly concentrated at
a single point in the toe area. That’s what feels new to me. The rebound
on release is surprisingly weak…
So then I thought, “Maybe it’s better not to use vertical motion with this?” And when I skied it that way, turns clicked into place almost effortlessly. Just switch lightly along the X-axis, then ride it out. All those alpine-derived techniques become unnecessary. It might sound a bit dumb when you put it like that, but if you see this as “simplifying the telemark turn,” it might just be a true game changer.
After all, telemark turns used to be complicated… Up-and-down motion,
initiation phase, completion phase, counter-rotation, maintaining a stable
telemark stanceーall of that can be set aside. Just switch flat and light,
then tip into the turn each timeーtelemark bliss. That’s the future I
caught a glimpse of in just two hours.
Give it a try.
|